What Will American Protestantism Look Like After The Wars Inside the ‘Seven Sisters’ Are Done?
Religion Unplugged believes in a diversity of well-reasoned and well-researched opinions. This piece reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily represent those of Religion Unplugged, its staff and contributors.
(OPINION) Over decades, the map of U.S. Protestantism has been redrawn by splits over the authority and interpretation of the Bible that eventually focused on the LGBT dispute. Now we have a major case study that journalists will need to cover at the local, regional, national and global levels.
A balanced coalition of leaders in the large United Methodist Church developed a treaty for mutually respectful separation — the Reconciliation and Grace Through Separation protocol — but that’s currently degenerating into a wasteful fight like other groups have suffered.
Reporters and concerned readers will want to dive into these commentaries and news stories:
* Look at a United Methodist timeline: Why are conservatives going nuclear with lawsuits?
* What happened to United Methodists’ proposal to split the denomination?
* Time is running out for traditionalist United Methodists!
* For United Methodists, the center is not holding
* Special sessions of United Methodist annual conferences 2022
* United Methodist Church bishops mount defense amid conservative attacks (paywall protected)
* Liberal bishops have redefined United Methodist polity
The current maneuvers by the North American UMC establishment may well limit the number of dropouts joining the Global Methodist Church. Its vision has been to unite a million or more U.S. Methodist evangelicals with the growing Methodist churches in Africa and Asia, creating an effective and innovative international denomination dedicated to defending current United Methodist doctrines. This could help counteract some U.S. conservatives’ drift into Christian nationalism. Is that still feasible?
More broadly, when the dust settles, what will a declining American Protestantism look like?
A neglected factor that writers should pursue with historians and activist insiders is the decline of the formerly pivotal mainline evangelicals such as those starting to break from the UMC. The Guy proposes the following theory for consideration.
From Jamestown and Plymouth until recent times, predominantly White, relatively well-educated and affluent mainline Protestant churches were central to American culture. As of 2022, the most prominent such groups — sociologists call them the “Seven Sisters” — are the UMC, American Baptist Churches, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Presbyterian Church (USA) and United Church of Christ.
Since around 1965, they have suffered inexorable and unprecedented membership losses from battles over doctrine, splits, low birth rates, waning youth participation and individuals marching or drifting away.
In past times, the doctrinally diverse mainline denominations contained vigorous minority wings of conservative evangelicals, collectively numbering in the millions, who lacked bureaucratic power but were strong at the local level. By definition, these believers rejected “fundamentalism,” which restricts fellowship to separatist churches that require a particular version of biblical orthodoxy.
The more flexible evangelicals within mainline denominations were simultaneously involved in the evangelical movement outside the mainline fold, with its innovative parachurch agencies in domestic and foreign evangelism, conference ministries, broadcasting, publishing, music and more. The charismatic renewal movement played a major role, as well.
That epoch appears to be ending — period.
Year by year, mainline groups have become more liberal, seen most obviously in the LGBTQ disputes, and less friendly toward their evangelical sectors that felt forced to reject the new sexual revisionism. Rancor, loss of money, legal bills and energy and church splits are the inevitable results.
As mainline evangelicals shrink to irrelevance, the results will almost surely further damage the mainline.
Ask the experts, but these evangelicals had produced stable or even growing congregations, offering-plate proceeds, clergy candidates, charity volunteers, program innovations and hustle that energized the mainline. They perhaps also moderated left-wing excesses.
Less obvious but equally or more crucial is how the decline and exit of mainline evangelicals will damage the evangelical movement itself.
These between-the-lines Bible believers produced impressive leaders. Their continual engagement with liberals and secular pressures provided sophistication in outreach and Christian culture — most notably not in the U.S. but within the Church of England. Finally, they tended to moderate the U.S. political zealotry that increasingly riles evangelicalism, increases a yawning gap between church leaders and the grassroots, heightens America’s polarization and compromises spiritual impact.
In other words, without a robust mainline element, the evangelical movement cannot rival the cultural impact that older mainline churches once enjoyed. It is retreating into smaller and relatively weak denominations and, moreso, into zealously independent nondenominational congregations.
Too often, the independents’ lack of accountability through wider fellowship has fostered scandal and eccentricity. When believers withdraw into the comfort zones of united but separated cells, will an emerging new kind of almost fundamentalism alter what we’ve known as evangelicalism since World War II, or will ties to the Global South moderate that?
Richard Ostling is a former religion reporter for The Associated Press and former correspondent for TIME Magazine. This piece first appeared at Get Religion.