Christianity Today's editorial: Much ado about nothing?
NEW YORK — A surprising editorial from the evangelical magazine Christianity Today on Thursday called for President Donald Trump’s removal from office. Reactions have ranged from shock to shrugs, including disagreement about how surprising the piece was.
“Honestly my mouth dropped open when this hit the internet: Christianity Today, an influential evangelical magazine, says President Trump should be ‘removed from office,’” tweeted Sarah Pulliam Bailey, a Washington Post religion reporter who used to work at the magazine.
Honestly my mouth dropped open when this hit the internet:
— Sarah Pulliam Bailey (@spulliam) December 19, 2019
Christianity Today, an influential evangelical magazine, says President Trump should be ‘removed from office’
I spoke with the author Mark Galli and president Timothy Dalrymple for the backstory:https://t.co/NOx2da2amC
Many observers noted that the magazine was founded by the late pastor Billy Graham, whose son Franklin Graham is among Trump’s most prominent evangelical supporters.
Graham wrote on Twitter that the editorial compelled him to reveal that his father, who died in 2018, had voted for Trump: “My father knew @realDonaldTrump, believed in him & voted for him. He believed Donald J. Trump was the man for this hour in history for our nation.”
I hadn’t shared who my father @BillyGraham voted for in 2016, but because of @CTMagazine’s article, I felt it necessary to share now. My father knew @realDonaldTrump, believed in him & voted for him. He believed Donald J. Trump was the man for this hour in history for our nation.
— Franklin Graham (@Franklin_Graham) December 20, 2019
Graham’s niece, Jerushah Duford, an evangelical author who has been critical of Trump, disagreed.
Maybe a little late but I can not help but think my grandfather, as a founder would be proud of the courage demonstrated here. https://t.co/uovBPyAWX2
— jerushah duford (@jerushahruth) December 19, 2019
Trump enjoyed plenty of evangelical support in the 2016 election and continues to do so heading into the 2020 elections.
Ralph Reed, who founded the conservative Christian Freedom Coalition, said the magazine was “completely out of touch with evangelicals” on the issue of impeachment.
81% of self-identified evangelicals voted for Donald Trump in 2016 and 83% approve of his job performance as @POTUS. They oppose impeachment overwhelmingly. On this issue, CT is completely out of touch with evangelicals. https://t.co/rjWWNvTtvE
— Ralph Reed (@ralphreed) December 20, 2019
The editorial’s author, Christianity Today’s soon-to-retire editor in chief Mark Galli, implored religious Christians who voted for Trump to reevaluate their political bargain.
“Remember who you are and whom you serve. Consider how your justification of Mr. Trump influences your witness to your Lord and Savior. Consider what an unbelieving world will say if you continue to brush off Mr. Trump’s immoral words and behavior in the cause of political expediency.”
Carl R. Trueman, a professor of biblical and religious studies, published a blog post on Friday criticizing Galli for “accusing every Trump voter of heinous sin, however reluctant or conflicted he may be.”
Trueman described the sentiments expressed by Galli as reflections of something larger. “Evangelical elites are clearly as out of touch with the populist evangelical base as is the case in society in general,” Trueman wrote. “And lambasting populist evangelicals as hypocrites or dimwits will simply perpetuate the divide.”
The magazine’s editorial director, Ted Olsen, tweeted an appeal for prayers on Friday morning after reading letters from angry readers. “For different reasons so many of these letters make me want to vomit,” he wrote. “But the Spirit is prompting ‘pray instead.’ So I am. It’d be awesome if you’d join me.”
I hate that this sounds like overly spiritual sweet inspirational Twitter. That’s not where I’m at right now. For different reasons so many of these letters make me want to vomit. But the Spirit is prompting “pray instead.” So I am. It’d be awesome if you’d join me. /END
— Ted Olsen (@tedolsen) December 20, 2019
Some commentary questioned how the issue was being framed by media outlets. Kendall Harmon, an Anglican minister in South Carolina, took to Twitter to lament the pigeonholing of a movement as diverse as evangelical Christianity:
The reaction to the CT editorial says at least as much as the ed itself,+once again belies the myth of some kind of monolithic #evangelical supprt 4 the current Pres. This was never the case, but the facile MSM narrative has bn allowed 2 run roughshod ovr the facts #religion #usa
— Kendall Harmon (@KendallHarmon6) December 20, 2019
Trump’s Christian supporters on social media were largely unmoved. Many balked at the suggestion that Christianity Today spoke for them or was persuasive in its argument.
For many, like Liberty University president and staunch Trump defender Jarry Falwell Jr., the editorial simply revealed the magazine as having a liberal ideology that is out of step with the vast majority of its movement in the U.S.
Less than 20% of evangelicals supported @HillaryClinton in 2016 but now @CTmagazine has removed any doubt that they are part of the same 17% or so of liberal evangelicals who have preached social gospel for decades! CT unmasked! https://t.co/O7WjyZSwiW
— Jerry Falwell (@JerryFalwellJr) December 20, 2019
Trying to say that Christianity Today speaks for all Evangelicals is like saying the Taliban speaks for all Muslims. This Pastor stands with @realDonaldTrump and I don’t care who it chaps.
— Pastor Greg Locke (@pastorlocke) December 20, 2019
In an interview with The Atlantic’s Emma Green, Galli said he knew his message wouldn’t land with evangelicals on the far right. “They don’t care what we think,” he said. “They think we’ve been co-opted by liberalism. So I understand that we do not represent the entire movement.”
Green wrote in the article that his piece “in no way” signals a mass defection of evangelicals from Trump or Republicans, but can’t be discounted as irrelevant. “What’s significant about Galli’s statement is how directly he makes the case that his fellow Christians have a responsibility to call out Trump’s immoral behavior,” she wrote.
As the Post’s Bailey continued covering the fallout on Friday, she mused on Twitter that some of the magazine’s critics seemed to care a bit more than they were copping to.
Well, I'm still processing. It's like the week before Christmas and everybody's busy, right? But one thing that's interesting is how Trump's advisors are like... magazine doesn't have influence, but they all feel the need to respond...
— Sarah Pulliam Bailey (@spulliam) December 20, 2019