What Is ‘Christian Nationalism’ And Is It Connected to the Jan. 6 Insurrection?
Religion Unplugged believes in a diversity of well-reasoned and well-researched opinions. This piece reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily represent those of Religion Unplugged, its staff and contributors.
(OPINION) THE QUESTION:
What is “Christian nationalism”?
THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER:
“Christian nationalism” became common coinage in the U.S. fairly recently, usually raised by cultural liberals who view it with alarm, and often with “White” as an added adjective. The term is not generally embraced by those considered to be participants.
As journalist Samuel Goldman remarks, to describe something as Christian nationalism “is inevitably to reject it.”
The Merriam-Webster definition of plain “nationalism” is “loyalty and devotion to a nation” but adds this important wording, “especially a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups.”
“Nationalism” is not the same as “patriotism,” the natural and benign love and loyalty toward one’s homeland that characterizes all peoples and countries, including huge numbers of non-nationalists on America’s religious left as well as the right. Nor is it the same thing as either political or religious conservatism but is instead a narrow faction within those broad populations.
The latest bid to shape public perceptions of the concept is a 63-page “Report on Christian Nationalism and the January 6 Insurrection,” issued last month by the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty and the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
These two organizations may seem odd partners, since FFRF claims that “persons free from religion” have brought about most of the West’s “moral progress.” But FFRF shares the Baptist committee’s devotion to strict separation of church and state and opposition to “targeting of religious minorities” and “the politicization of houses of worship” as well as to Christian nationalism.
The BJCRL includes American Baptist churches, major Black Baptist conventions, some remaining “moderate” Southern Baptists and others, but the leaders of the huge and conservative Southern Baptist Convention withdrew support in 1991.
According to the BJCRL-FFRF report, Christian nationalism is “a political ideology and cultural framework that seeks to merge American and Christian identities, distorting both the Christian faith and America’s constitutional democracy.” It “relies on the mythological founding of the United States as a ‘Christian nation,’ singled out for God’s providence in order to fulfill God’s purposes on earth.” Further, it “demands a privileged place for Christianity in public life, buttressed by the active support of government at all levels.”
“Christian nationalism is not Christianity,” the definition concludes, but the movement consists of individual Christians and “relies on Christian imagery and language.”
Though not part of the definition as such, the report’s focus on the Jan. 6 mob attack at the U.S. Capitol associates elements of the movement with threats and actual acts of violence against people and property. The Jan. 6 riot targeted the Capitol police and the democratically elected U.S. vice president and members of Congress carrying out their constitutional duty of tabulating the ballots for president cast by state delegations to the Electoral College.
The report includes essays by critics of evangelical and “religious right” groups and is weakened by avoiding any writers who’d explain opposing views. But it has new and valuable research in two lavishly footnoted articles by FFRC attorney Andrew Seidel on religious participation on Jan. 6 and events that led up to it. These data demonstrate this was a fringe phenomenon in religious terms, with little or no involvement by the major organizations and leaders in conservative Protestantism and Catholicism.
BJCRL executive director Amanda Taylor leads a specialized offshoot, Christians Against Christian Nationalism, which is endorsed by, for example, top officials of mainline Protestant denominations and the National Council of Churches; liberal evangelicals Tony Campolo, Shane Claiborne and Jim Wallis; and activist Catholic nun Simone Campbell.
CACN says that survey research shows those who embrace Christian nationalism are more likely than other Americans to demand “respect for national symbols and traditions”; fear “Muslims, Atheists and Jewish people”; “condone police violence toward Black Americans”; “hold anti-immigrant views”; and “believe that men are better suited for all leadership roles.”
A rather different assessment by Paul D. Miller, a Georgetown University professor and Southern Baptist consultant, was issued a month after the Capitol riot by Christianity Today, a voice of the evangelical “establishment” that grassroots activists typically spurn nowadays.
Here are some of his points.
CONTINUE READING: “What is Christian nationalism?” by Richard Ostling.
Richard Ostling is a former religion reporter for The Associated Press and former correspondent for TIME Magazine. This piece first appeared at Get Religion.
Earlier in this Collection
-
The possibility of President Trump winning a second term is looking dimmer and dimmer as election results show President-Elect Joe Biden eking out a victory even in traditionally GOP states such as Arizona and Georgia. But these modern-day prophets aren’t taking no for an answer.
-
As the mob swarmed the Capitol steps, climbed the inaugural scaffolding and even scaled the building like it was a gym climbing wall, the now commonplace red, white and blue “Trump 2020” and “Make America Great Again” flags flew alongside flags and banners with a range of Christian symbols, including a white flag with a pine tree inspired by the Old Testament and used in the Revolutionary War.
-
Catholic clergy showed concern for the future of the United States and displayed a rare public patriotism after an insurrectionist mob broke into the Capitol building and resulted in the deaths of at least five people.
-
On the first Sunday since a pro-Trump insurrectionist mob sieged the U.S. Capitol, pastors offered comfort and some rebuke to their congregations concerned for the future of American democracy. "The American nation will be healed when the American church repents. We must repent for making the person who occupies the White House more important than the one who occupies our hearts," said Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference who became known for his support of Trump.
-
A day of reckoning has come for modern-day "prophets" in the Pentecostal/charismatic movement who falsely foretold a victory for President Trump in 2020. Privately and on social media, these prophets and their thousands of followers are slugging it out in an orgy of self-blame, recriminations and fantastical hopes that somehow before Jan. 20, God will bring about a victory for Trump. Others who’ve apologized for getting it wrong have gotten accusations, curses and even death threats.
-
(OPINION) This season of Epiphany, which we are now in, affords us the opportunity to honor Christ’s manifestation and ministry in the world. Epiphanytide invites us to reflect on the role of religious freedom and religious literacy in Christ’s manifestation to the world. This is perhaps even more relevant in light of the Capitol violence last week.
-
As thousands rallied in Washington to support President Donald Trump’s unproven claim of a stolen election — a protest that turned deadly as an insurrectionist mob stormed the U.S. Capitol — many carried signs and flags linking the Republican political leader to their Christian faith.
-
This week’s Weekend Plug-in explores why Christians seem so susceptible to conspiracy theories. Plus, as always, check out the best reads in the world of faith news.
-
Mike Lindell, MyPillow CEO and now-popular Trump supporter, appeared on the Eric Metaxas Radio Show to discuss more “proof” he’d discovered about widespread election fraud. “God’s got his hand in all of this,” he said.
-
(ANALYSIS) In the months since the election, the Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family has regularly provided election skeptics with plentiful ammunition and has embraced men and women in Congress who voted to overturn state election results. Meanwhile, Focus’s partner organization in Washington, D.C., the Family Research Council, continues to claim the election was stolen, and that Antifa—not Trump supporters—may have caused the Capitol attack on Jan. 6.
-
(OPINION) Conservative Christians propose that the final day of Trump’s campaign to overturn President Biden’s Electoral College victory involved religious "heresy" or "apostasy." A survey by the conservative American Enterprise Institute shows 63% of White evangelicals think Biden’s win was illegitimate, despite the numerous federal and state court rulings that found no evidence for Trump’s claim of a "sacred landslide." But to what extent were Christians implicated in the Capitol mayhem?
-
After an embarrassing number of wrong prophecies and bungled predictions about the 2020 election, a group of charismatic Christian leaders have released a four-page statement of "prophetic standards" to help correct abuses in the movement.
-
(OPINION) One year after ReligionUnplugged senior contributor Hamil R. Harris reported from the Capitol rally turned into a siege, he reflects on what’s needed for America to heal deep political and racial divisions.
-
(OPINION) According to the script of "FBI: Most Wanted," Jan. 6, 2021, was most certainly an insurrection. And even though this particular group of fanatics represented a small minority of Americans, they were depicted as the very image of the insurrection itself. But there is another side to this story.
Up Next in this Collection
-
(OPINION) The latest bid to shape public perceptions of the concept of Christian nationalism is a 63-page “Report on Christian Nationalism and the January 6 Insurrection,” issued last month by the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty and the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
-
(ANALYSIS) Without merit.” “Mere speculation and conjecture.” “Gossip and innuendo.” “Wholly unreliable.” “Implausible.” “Hazy and nebulous.” That’s how judges responded to 61 election lawsuits filed by Trump’s legal teams. Meanwhile, conservative Christian influencers used their media platforms outlets to promote these false claims about the election to believers. Here’s a look at eight of the most prominent promoters of the former president’s lies.