Religion Unplugged believes in a diversity of well-reasoned and well-researched opinions. This piece reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily represent those of Religion Unplugged, its staff and contributors.

(OPINION) THE QUESTION:

What is religion?

OSTLING’S ANSWER:

Oddly, “Religion Q&A” entered its ninth year online before getting around to this question.

It’s not an easy one.

During the tax season, we may not feel particularly fond toward the IRS but can pity the staffers who spent years on a long-running dispute that ended in 1993 when the godless Scientology system was finally defined as a “religion” and thus eligible for the tax exemption benefit.

Then there are the federal and state disputes — beloved of journalists and too numerous to summarize here — over tax exemption for the “Universal Life Church,” and whether marriages performed by its clergy are legit. The ULC provides instant internet ordinations, sometimes for the likes of comedian Conan O’Brien, with no questions asked and no requirements of training, creed, or church. The ordination itself is free but the group sells such paraphernalia as a “Doctor of Divinity” certificate, a bargain at $20, and a $59.99 kit for performing weddings.

Let’s back up for the basics. Whatever the IRS might think, here are definitions of “religion” from the authoritative Merriam-Webster folks :

* “The service and worship of God or the supernatural.”

* “Commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance” (which is certainly a circular definition. Religion is religious.).

* “A personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices.” (Again, religion is religious.)

* “A cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith.” (This means devoutly embraced atheism or Communism can be deemed a de facto religion although, as “Religion Q & A” has learned over the years, this terminology can provoke atheists’ fury.)

Another definition, labeled “archaic,” is “scrupulous conformity” to something. (Ostling insists this usage is not archaic. We journalists regularly say secular commitments and attitudes are “religious.”)

Another eternally trusted resource, the Encyclopedia Britannica, fleshes out matters with pretty much the best that can be done with this tricky definition. It states that religion is humans’ relation to what they regard as “holy, sacred, absolute, spiritual, divine, or worthy of especial reverence.” Religion is also the ways people deal with “ultimate concerns” about this life and the hereafter, what happens to us after death.

The encyclopedia wisely adds that there are also “humanistic or naturalistic forms of religion” that involve relationships and attitudes toward the human community or the natural world. Many observers will say that for non-religious people, committed environmentalism sometimes fills the place that religion serves in the lives of worshippers. The same goes for political enthusiasms.

We’re further informed that “many” (so presumably not all) religions uplift texts that have “scriptural status,” and esteemed individuals who are invested with “spiritual or moral authority.” Believers “often” (so presumably not always) participate in devotional practices such as ‘prayer, meditation, or particular rituals.” In addition, “worship, moral conduct, right belief, and participation in religious institutions are among the constituent elements” of religions.

This whole topic is brought to mind by a recent article at theconversation.com that began by pondering the January 6 U.S. Capitol riot and the inauguration soon after. The author, Samuel L. Boyd, teaches religion and Jewish studies at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Inaugurations have elements of what scholars call the nation’s “civil religion,” namely the offering of public prayers, the oath sworn on a Bible that has special significance for the oath-taker, and the oath itself, in which presidents and vice presidents always add at the end the traditional “so help me God,” a phrase not found in the wording prescribed by the U.S. Constitution (Article II section 1).

In the Jan. 6 mayhem, too, there were perplexing “religious” elements, he notes.

Richard Ostling is a former religion reporter for the Associated Press and former correspondent for TIME Magazine. This piece first appeared at Get Religion.